What classification applies to cases with insufficient evidence to resolve a complaint?

The classification of "Not sustained" is applied to cases where there is insufficient evidence to resolve a complaint, meaning that while the complaint has been brought forward, the evidence does not support a definitive conclusion either way. In this context, it indicates that the investigation has not provided enough factual backing to either confirm or dismiss the allegations made.

This classification serves an important role in the disciplinary process. When a complaint is categorized as not sustained, it informs all parties involved that there was an attempt to investigate the claims, but the lack of sufficient evidence prevents a clear determination. This helps in maintaining procedural integrity and ensures that cases are handled with fairness, acknowledging the importance of evidence in making just decisions.

In contrast, other classifications have distinct definitions and implications. For instance, an exonerated classification would imply that evidence conclusively proved that the officer acted properly, while unfounded would indicate that the allegations were false or did not have merit. Sustained means that the investigation found sufficient evidence to uphold the complaint, which is not applicable when evidence is lacking.