What is a likely outcome if ratings are based on inadequate evidence?

When ratings are based on inadequate evidence, the likely outcome is bias in evaluations. This is primarily because insufficient evidence can lead to subjective interpretations and personal biases influencing how performance is judged. Without solid, objective criteria or data to support evaluations, supervisors may rely on their preconceptions, stereotypes, or even personal relationships with the personnel being rated. As a result, this can skew the evaluation process, leading to unfair assessments that do not accurately reflect an individual’s true performance.

The emphasis on adequate evidence in performance evaluations is essential for maintaining fairness and ensuring that assessments are grounded in observable and measurable behaviors. This allows for a more reliable and valid evaluation process that supports professional growth and accountability within the police force. In contrast, when evaluations lack the necessary evidence, they become more susceptible to inconsistency, leading to potentially harmful consequences for both the personnel and the organization.